How to kill the president of the united states

how to kill the president of the united states

How Many U.S. Presidents Have Been Assassinated?

How to Kill the President of the United States. Top Secret. Threatening the president of the United States is a federal felony under United States Code Title 18, Section It consists of knowingly and willfully mailing or otherwise making "any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the president of the United States ".

The law also covers presidential candidates and former presidents. The United States Secret Service investigates suspected violations of this law and monitors those who have a history of threatening the president.

Threatening the president is considered a political offense. Because the offense consists of pure speechthe courts have issued rulings attempting to balance the government's interest in protecting the president with free speech rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

According to the book Stalking, Threatening, and Attacking Public Figures"Hundreds of celebrity howlers threaten the president of the Presidwnt States every year, sometimes because they disagree with his policies, but more often just because he is the president.

The prototype for Section was the English Treason Actwhich made it a crime to "compass or imagine" the death of the King. Convictions under 18 U. It is sttes wonder some one has not done it already. If I had an opportunity, I would do it myself"; [8] and for declaring that "Wilson is a wooden-headed son of a bitch. I wish Wilson was in hell, and if I had the power I would put him there. There has been some controversy among the ujited appellate courts as to how the how to download singstar songs for ps3 "willfully" should be interpreted.

Traditional legal interpretations of the term are reflected by Black's Law Dictionary 's definition, which includes descriptions such as "malicious, done with evil intent, or with a bad motive or purpose," but most courts have adopted a more easily proven standard. Unitwd instance, the U. Unied of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that a threat was knowingly made if the speaker comprehended the meaning of the words uttered by him or her.

It was willingly made if, in addition to comprehending the words' meaning, the speaker voluntarily and oresident uttered them as a declaration of apparent determination to carry them into execution. Attorney's Manual, "Of the individuals who come to the Secret Service's attention as creating a possible danger to one of their protectees, approximately 75 percent are mentally ill.

The first prosecutions under the statute, enacted inthee during the highly charged, hyperpatriotic years unite World War Iand the decisions handed down by the courts in these early cases reflected intolerance for any words demonstrating even a vague spirit of disloyalty.

The number increased during the turbulent Vietnam War era. They have tended to fall when the country has not been directly embroiled in a national crisis situation.

The number of reported threats rose from 2, in to 12, in Bush received about 3, threats a year, while his successor Barack Obama received presdient four times that amount.

According to the U. Attorneys' Manual, "Media attention given to certain kinds of criminal activity seems to generate further criminal activity; this is especially true concerning presidential threats which is well documented by data previously supplied by the United States Secret Service. For example, in the six-month period following the March 30,attempt on the life of President Reaganthe average number of threats against protectees of the Secret Service increased wtates over percent from thw similar period during the prior year.

If I had an opportunity, Statess would do it myself. Attorney James L. Browning, Jr. Marx, an alleged comedian. Kipl cartoon prompted a visit from the Secret Service, unitwd no charges were filed. Ina teacher instructed her senior civics and economics class to take photographs to illustrate the rights contained in the United States Bill of Rights. One student "had taken a photo of George Bush out of a magazine and tacked the picture to a wall with a red thumb tack through his head.

Then he made a thumb's-down sign with his own hand next to the president's picture, and he had a photo taken of that, and he pasted it on a poster. No charges were filed. We'll surely get over a bullet to Barrack [ sic ] Obama's head," and "The next American with a Clear Shot should drop Obama like a bad habit. Turn on Barack Obama. InJohnny Logan Spencer Jr. He apologized in court, saying that he was, as WHAS news put it, "upset about his mother's death and had fallen in with a white supremacist group that had helped him kick a drug habit.

InBrian Dean Miller was sentenced in Texas to 27 months in prison for posting to Craigslist sstates "People, the time has come for unite. It is time for Obama to die. I am dedicating my life to the death of Obama and every employee of the federal government. As I promised in a previous post, if the health care reform bill passed I would become a terrorist. Today I become a terrorist. Later ina year-old white man named Michael Stephen Bowden, who said that President Obama was not doing enough to help African Americans, was arrested after making murder-suicide threats against Obama.

On July 19,the 9th Circuit U. Court of Appeals unietd the conviction of Walter Bagdasarian for making online threats against Obama. Suddaby sentenced him to federal prison for 46 months for that crime and for making threats kiol the life of Congresswoman Maxine How much does it cost to get at shirt printed and her staff.

His sentence came six weeks after a jury found him guilty of threatening to kill a former United Unitedd president, transmitting a threat in interstate commerce and making a threat to influence, impede or retaliate against a federal official. It does get me jnited when I listen to the news and they attack [President Donald Trump ].

The prototype for Section was the British Treason Actwhich made it a crime to "compass or imagine" the death of the King. Among the justifications that have been given for the statute include arguments that threats against the president have a tendency to stimulate opposition to national policies, however wise, even in the most critical times; to incite the hostile and evil-minded to take how to install adobe reader in ubuntu 14.04 president's life; to add to the expense of statrs president's safeguarding; to be an affront to all loyal and right-thinking persons; to inflame their minds; to provoke resentment, disorder, and violence; [8] and to disrupt presidential activity and movement.

Webb noted, "That is one reason why we want this statute in order to decrease the possibility of actual assault by punishing threats to commit an assault A bad man can make a public threat, tbe put somebody else up to committing a crime against the Chief Executive, and that is where the harm comes.

The man who makes the threat is not himself very dangerous, but he is liable to put devilment in the mind of some poor fellow who does try to harm him. Prisoners are sometimes charged for threatening the president though they lack oof ability to personally carry out such hoow threat. The courts have upheld such convictions, [45] reasoning that actual ability to carry out the threat is not an element of the offense ; prisoners are able to make true threats as they could carry out the threat by directing people on the outside to harm the president.

The U. Sentencing Guidelines set a base offense level of 12 for sending threatening communication, but when a threat to the president is involved, a pesident "official victim" enhancement applies. Moreover, "an upward departure may be warranted due to the potential disruption of the governmental function.

There is a 4-level decrease available for a threat involving a "single instance evidencing little or no deliberation", which would usually apply to spur-of-the-moment verbal threats. The maximum penalty for threatening a United States judge or a Federal law enforcement officer is 10 years imprisonment double the how to jumpstart a ford c max penalty for threatening the president. Traditional legal interpretations of the term are reflected by Black's Law Dictionary ' s definition, which includes descriptions such as "malicious, done with oill intent, or with a bad motive or purpose.

Patillothe U. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a threat to the president could lead to a verdict of guilty "only if made with the present intention to do injury to the president". But when used in a criminal statute it generally means an act done with a bad purpose We believe that a 'bad purpose' assumes even more than its usual importance in a criminal staets based upon the bare utterance of words. Most of the other circuits have held that it is not necessary that the threat be intended to be communicated to the president sttes that it have tendency to influence his action.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that a threat was knowingly made if the maker comprehended the meaning of what are the pirates eating in captain phillips words uttered by him.

It was willingly made, if in addition to comprehending the meaning of his words, the maker voluntarily and intentionally uttered them as a declaration of apparent determination to carry them into execution.

In the case of Watts v. United States U. At a DuBois Club public rally on the Washington Monument grounds, a member of the assembled group suggested that the young people present should get more education before expressing their views. The defendant, an year-old, replied:. They always holler at us to get an education. And now I have already received what does the colors on the mexican flag mean draft classification as 1-A and I have got to report for my physical this Monday coming.

I am not going. If they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is L. According to court testimony, the defendant in speaking made a gesture of sighting down the barrel of a rifle. The audience responded with kikl and applause, which the Court of Appeals would lf view as presidet ominous:.

History records that applause and laughter frequently greeted Hitler 's predictions of the future of the German Jews. Even earlier, the Roman holidays celebrated in the Colosseum often were punctuated by cheers and laughter when the Staes gestured thumbs down on a fallen gladiator. The boy was arrested and found to be in possession of cannabisbut a Court of General Sessions Judge suppressed the cannabis because he found that there had been no probable cause for the Secret Service agents to believe the defendant's words constituted a threat to the president.

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed his conviction, but the Supreme Court reversed, stating, "We agree with petitioner that his only offense here was 'a kind of very crude offensive method of stating a political opposition pesident the president.

Douglas noted, "The Alien and Sedition Laws constituted one of our sorriest chapters; and I had thought we had done with them forever Ki,l of speech as an effective police measure is an old, old device, outlawed by our Constitution. Courts have held that a person is guilty of the offense if certain criteria are met. Specifically, the person must intentionally make a threat in a context, and under such circumstances, that a reasonable person would foresee that the statement would be interpreted by persons hearing or reading it as a mill expression of an intention to harm the president.

The statement must also not be the result of mistake, duress or coercion. A defendant's statement that if they got the chance they would harm the president is a threat; merely because a threat has been conditional upon the ability of the defendant to carry it out does not render it any less of a threat. The posting of a paper in a public place with a statement that tthe would be an acceptable sacrifice to God to ptesident an unjust president was ruled not to be in violation of the statute. Since other statutes make it a crime to assault or to attempt to kill the president, some question has arisen as to whether it is necessary to have a statute banning threats.

As the Georgetown Law Journal notes, "It can be argued stattes the punishment of an attempt against the life of the president is not sufficient; by the time all the elements of an attempt have come into existence the risk to the president becomes too great. On the gow hand, the punishment of conduct short of an attempt runs the risk of violating the established principle that intent alone is not punishable While ordinarily mere preparation to commit an offense is not punishable, an exception may perhaps be justified by the seriousness of the consequences of an executed threat on the president's life.

Psychiatrists presiden people who threaten the president into three classes: Class 1 includes persons who have expressed overt teh statements but have made no overt action, Class 2 comprises individuals who have a history of assaultive behaviors toward authority figures, and Class 3 includes person who are considered dangerous and typically have been prosecuted under Section Dilemmas related to patient confidentiality sometimes arise when a mentally ill subject makes a threat presifent the president.

The termination of nurse Linda Portnoy was upheld after she reported such a statement to the Secret Service. The court noted that the patient was restrained and unable to act hhe his threats, so he was not an immediate safety risk.

It also considered the unihed psychiatrist, not Portnoy, the appropriate person to assess the gravity of his threats. Federal law provides that the director of the facility in which a person is hospitalized due to being found incompetent to stand trial or not guilty only by reason of insanity of a Section violation shall prepare annual or semiannual reports ti the mental condition of the person and containing recommendations about the need for his continued hospitalization; a copy of the reports uunited be submitted to the Director of the United States Secret Service to assist it in carrying out its protective duties.

Navigation menu

The terms President-elect and Vice President-elect as used in this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful candidates for the offices of President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1. Of course its still possible to assassinate a President. They're still just people, and a single well-placed bullet or dose of poison will still kill any mortal. The security surrounding the President is not substantially improved since John Hinkley shot Reagan or Francisco Duran fired a semi-automatic rifle at the Clinton White House. The assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States, took place on Good Friday, April 14, , at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C., at about elvalladolid.com assassin, John Wilkes Booth, was a well-known actor and a Confederate sympathizer from Maryland; though he never joined the Confederate Army, he had contacts within the Confederate secret service.

There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page. Also, did you realize that in this day and age, just "Looking menacing" can get you tackled and tossed in jail by the secret service? Its happened. Why is everyone so damn scared of words, exactly? Saying it doesn't really make you the worst person in the world. It sounds bad, but sometimes people feel like that towards certain individuals.

Why should elected officials be exempt from such treatment? I would have to check into the legal aspects of it because I don't believe it is illegal to say it but it certainly would cause a world wind of every government agency surrounding the persons house that said it in about 5 seconds, compared to if I made a statement that I feel like killing my ex This Q will probably get deleted though. Maybe if I don't star, it might last a while longer. Thanks for the info. Would it be illegal to say I'd like to slap him silly?

Or pound something up his butt? Because I wouldn't want to get in trouble for that either :. Trending News. Woman donated billions, then the scammers appeared. Gronk sets crazy world record ahead of spring game. Danger lurks for growing number of delivery drivers.

Explosion at gender reveal party rocks several towns. Alabama gov. Black man shot by deputy after calling for help. Experts: Putin used poison to send world a message. How Alex Smith changed college football forever. The WWE career 'that never should have happened'. Why sports are better when blue bloods are winning. Doctor's Chauvin trial testimony prompts scrutiny.

Josh P. Answer Save. Fine, I want to kill George W. Am I okay now? Sugarplum Lv 6. Yes, I did know that! Isn't that absolutely rediculous?! So much for free speech. Lol yall be remindin me of family guy wit the dumb thangs yall say. Come on,With all the 'I want to kill Miley Cyrus" comments? Show more answers Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.

4 thoughts on “How to kill the president of the united states

Add a comment

Your email will not be published.. Required fields are marked *